Mooring Bitts for Towage

MOORING BITTS FOR TOWAGE

During the last few years tug companies have upgraded their fleets to include more powerful tugs and many of these new tugs are rated with a bollard pull of over 60 tonnes. In addition to the problems identified in the previous MAIB report, pilots also now need to be aware of the load specifications of the mooring bitts of a vessel which may also used for towing. In recent years it has become mandatory to mark the Safe Working Load (SWL) on the bollards and this has been useful in guiding us as to how much tug power can be used.  In view of this I was interested to learn from the specifications that the actual SWL for towing is actually twice the bitt rating and this is explained in the following extract from the construction rules:

The British Standard refers to the methods of belaying the rope as ‘mooring’ for figure-of-eight belaying, and ‘towing’ for loop belaying. The ‘towing’ SWL is twice the mooring’ SWL. The reason that the SWL depends on the method of rope belaying is that certain belaying methods tend to pull the two posts together and thus induce a

higher stress in each barrel than that produced by an eye laid around a single post. With figure-of-eight belaying, the loading in each post corresponds to the sum of all forces in the successive rope layers, which can be higher than the maximum rope load. Experienced mariners are aware of this phenomenon and have devised methods that

effectively distribute the external load over the two posts (for instance, by taking one or two turns around the first post before starting to belay in figure-of- eight fashion). Nevertheless, IS0 takes a conservative approach by assuming that some mariners may lack this knowledge. There is only one problem with this and it is a major one. Experience indicates that ship owners usually take the maximum rating from the bitts and then use this figure to calculate the rating for the fairleads so, unless the fairlead is clearly marked at the higher rating then it is prudent to only use the marked SWL rating as the maximum for towing. This factor possibly explains why there are increasing reports of fairleads rather than the bitts failing whilst towing! I have also been advised that the load ratings are set by the manufacturers of the fairleads and bitts but the SWL marked is not necessarily applicable to the fixing to the deck or bulwarks!

2 Responses to “Mooring Bitts for Towage”



George Perkins
August 31st, 2013 at 10:30

There is a huge shortfall in mooring knowledge which extends to Ports. The Oil and Gas Industry is well ahead in this field. The concern about Ports these days is the qualification, experience and knowledge of a number of managers now running them.

 


Ante
November 24th, 2023 at 21:36

Our markings on the bitts are “tow 32t” and “only 64t” what confuses the crew where to place the tug’s line, more than from the time when there was no such markings. They think that the bitts are marked with tow 32t for the tug, moreover it is closest to the fairlead and make them sense.
They don’t think with their heads, but what the author meant.
Two turns before figure of eight is good, but now I don’t understand how the external load is distributed equally over the two posts if here two turns ona a single bitt takes on the biggest load that can be noticed when you start taking off the rope from the same bitt where you can hold a rope with your hands when is partly tight. The next turns are just to keep the first two.
It seems that aspiring students write these rules in order to justify their persistence and that ratification of the same was passed by the economist.

 

Leave a Reply

UK Maritime Pilots' Association
European Maritime Pilots' Association
Internation Pilots' Association SITE SPONSORS
Navicom Dynamics
OMC International